Rubrics, Assessment and eProctoring in Education

Research suggests the only way to effectively combat online cheating for now is holding exams in person.

Representing the work of those pursuing academic integrity in systematic, innovative, and scaled ways. All 50 projects were nominated for the Professor Tracey Bretag Prize in 2021-2022, designed for prevention, positive staff and student experience, and holistic change.

Feedback seeks to help students improve in the future, while grading evaluates past learning. Often, we mix the two together, but doing so can have consequences (Winstone and Boud, 2022), for example:

Professor Michael Sankey This work is an extrapolation of work originally published in: Sankey, M. D. (2022). The state of Australasian online higher education post-pandemic and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(2), 14-26.https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.2 Presenting on Authentic Assessment AssessmentTools and tips for useCreate an online social media advertisement on the topic you’re learningMost students…

Presentation by Professor Michael Sankey to the InspireEd Conference 2022

Assessment is usually one of three kinds: of, for and as learning. Sometimes assessment can also be a combination of more than one of these types.

Grades may be a crude incentive for students aspiring to the highest performance, but they have little influence on those who take satisfaction from the learning process.

At a time in which we seem to be giving more attention to parent complaints about how their children are taught, let's loosen old rules.

A new study of academic integrity policies and practices at 41 Australian universities found little evidence of changes to deal with cheating and academic misconduct arising from online assessment.

How students are assessed is among the most totemic issues in pedagogy. Debbie McVitty finds out what it takes to make assessment change happen